Spontaneous Generation of Lice
(Revised: 01/04/10)
“Of all the legendary and fantastic diseases of ancient times,
phthiriasis, or the ‘lousy disease’, was the most
intriguing and bizarre. In the corrupted humors of the sufferers
of this disease, lice were believed to develop by spontaneous
generation, and tumors full of these insects rose on the skin.
When such a tumor was incised, a stream of insects swarmed out.
The flesh of the sufferer was slowly eaten away and
transubstantiated into lice, and he perished miserably in this
‘most horrible of diseases’. Another singular characteristic for
phthiriasis was that it was firmly believed to be divine
punishment to tyrants, desecrators and enemies of religion.”
[Bondeson, 1998]
“Before
the invention of the microscope the belief was widespread that
lice were generated spontaneously from dirt, some other disease or
decomposing sweat. Such misconceptions were just as common in
Chinese medicine as in European [Hoeppli, 1959]
and in both cultures the nits were regarded as sterile or perhaps
not even eggs at all.” [Burgess, 1995]
“John W.
Maunder, a British entomologist, has explained this apparent
anomaly by noting that: “When
searched for, live eggs will be seen against the background of the
scalp and are usually camouflaged by being the same color as the
scalp. The female has some ability to change the shade of the egg
in order to provide minimum contrast.
… At
the time of hatching, the now empty eggshell becomes a brilliant
snowy white in colour, an example of distractive colouration. It
is now an advantage for the nit to be seen, for this draws
attention away from the darker living eggs. … The great Aristotle
was only partially deceived by this. He records that the eggs of
lice never hatch, but clearly did not recognize that the vast
majority of eggs in the hair of an established infection are empty
shells, long hatched.”
[Maunder, 1983]
c. 1500 BC The Asian Indian Vedic laws of Manu state: “From
hot moisture spring stinging and biting insects, lice, flies,
bugs, and all other (creatures) of that kind which are produced by
heat.” [Buhler, 1866]
c. 1446 BC In the Hebrew bible [Berlin, 1985], originally
written between 1000 BC and 586 BC [Finkelstein & Silberman,
2001], the book of Exodus [8:12-16] describes the plague of
‘lice’ visited in ~1446 BC Egypt. “And
the LORD said unto Moses, say to Aaron: Hold out your rod, and
strike the dust of the earth, and it shall turn to lice throughout
the land of Egypt. And they did so. Aaron held out his arm with
the rod, and struck the dust of the earth, and vermin came upon
man and beast; all the dust of the earth turned to lice throughout
the land of Egypt.”[Berlin, 1985]
“The
Hebrew word for this pest is kinnem / kinnam, possibly
referring to a small species that is hardly visible but which had
a very painful sting. The word also appears in Psalm 105:31 and
Isaiah 51:6, but the meaning of the Hebrew word is not clear. The
Hebrew word may be derived from the Egyptian word chenemes,
meaning gnats or mosquitoes. Residents of Egypt
themselves, Origen of Alexandria (Homilies on Exodus 4.6)
and the Jewish philosopher and theologian Philo of Alexandria (Life
of Moses, I), identified this plague as gnats, as it is also
identified in the Septuagint translation of the Old Testament.
However, Josephus (Antiquities of the Jews, 2.14.3) and the
Rabbinic writers of the Jewish Talmud identified this pest as
lice. Modern scholars agree with Origen (c. 185-254) and Philo
(20 BC – 50AD) that the etymology of the word suggests gnats or
mosquitoes and see no foundation for the identification of the
third plague as lice (Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew-English
Lexicon, # 3654, page 487; Davis, Studies in Exodus,
page 111; Childs, The Book of Exodus, page 129).” [Anon.,
2009] [(Philo) Wikipedia, 2009] [(Origen) Wikipedia, 2009]
800 BC In Book XIX of the ‘Iliad,’ Homer “-
lets Achilles
speak of the danger of flies slipping into the open wounds of
Patroklos and there producing maggots – perhaps the earliest exact
observation in this matter.” [Zinsser, 1935] “…I
have grievous fear lest meantime on the gashed wounds of Menoitios’
valiant son flies light and breed worms therein, and defile his
corpse—for the life is slain out of him—and so all his flesh shall
rot.” [Homer, 800 BC]
5th Cent. BC Anaximander (c. 611-547 BC), a
Milesian (Turkish) philosopher – astronomer – geographer –
biologist. “…
he was the first teacher of the doctrin of Abiogenesis,
believing that eels and other aquatic forms of life are directly
produced from lifeless matter.” [Osborn, 1905] “This
doctrine of the origin of living from non-living matter … was held
for centuries in the crude form adopted by the Greeks, but has
been long since disproven and abandoned.” [Shull et al.,
1920]
350 BC Aristotle (384-322
BC) wrote:
“Of
insects that are not carnivorous but live on the juices of living
flesh, such as lice and fleas and bugs, all, without exception,
generate what are called ‘nits’, and these generate nothing….Lice
are generated out of the flesh of animals.
When lice are coming there is a kind of small eruption visible,
unaccompanied by any discharge of purulent matter; and if you
prick an animal in this condition at the spot of eruption, the
lice jump out. In some men the appearance of lice is a disease, in
cases where the body is surcharged with moisture; and indeed, men
have been known to succumb to this louse disease, as Alcman the
poet (7th Century B.C.) and the Syrian Pherecydes (6th
Century B.C.) are said to have done. Moreover, in certain diseases
lice appear in great abundance.”
[Aristotle, 350 BC]
c. 30 BC
Diodorus Siculus (c. 90 BC – c. 30
BC), a Greek historian, wrote a 40 book ‘Bibliotheca Historia’
based on earlier works by others. [(Diodorus) Wikipedia,
2009] In book 34 he claimed that Eunus, who led the slave
revolt on Sicily in 136 BC, was captured and died in prison of
phthiriasis, the ‘lousy disease’. He also“… revived
the old louse story – its origin from human skin and
perspiration.” [Zinsser, 1935]
c. 40 AD Aulus Cornelius Celsus (25 BC – 50 AD), a Roman
encyclopedist, published De Medicina in c. 40 AD. This work
was rediscovered by Pope Nicholas V and first published in 1478.
[(Aulus Celsus) Wikipedia, 2009]
“There
is also a kind of disorder in which lice are born between the
eyelashes; the Greeks call it phthiriasis. Since this comes
from a bad state of health it seldom fails to get worse; but
usually in time a very acrid discharge of rheum follows, and if
the eyeballs become severely ulcerated, it even destroys their
vision..”
[Celsus, 1935]
c. 94 AD Flavius Josephus [37-c. 100AD], a Jewish
historian, wrote: “….
for there
arose out of the bodies of the Egyptians (of the Bible)
an innumerable quantity of lice, by which, wicked as they were,
they miserably perished, as not able to destroy this sort of
vermin either with washes or with ointments.” [Josephus,
94AD] However, see: [Anon, 2009] [(Josephus) Wikipedia,
2009)
c. 210 AD Claudius Aelianus or Aelian (ca. 175–ca. 235),
wrote of the tragic poet Pherecydes (6th
Century B.C.) that: “He
first of all sweated greatly, and then lice (φθερες)
grew, and as his flesh decomposed into lice, then followed
dissolution, and so he gave up the ghost.” [Kaposi,
1880]
5th Cent Caelius Aurelianus of Sicca in
Numidia was a Roman physician and writer on medical topics. [(Caelius
Aurelianus) Wikipedia, 2009] In “Chronic Diseases,” he
described phthiriasis: “The
signs of the disease are sleeplessness, itching of the body,
pallor, loss of appetite, weakness of the esophagus, and loss of
hair. The affection is one which involves a state of looseness.
For a considerable discharge of reddish bile appears through the
thin pores, and it is from this matter that the animals are
generated.” In another section of his work, Caelius noted
that diseases of the spleen are sometimes accompanied with lice
infestations. [Riddle, 1984]
c. 500 AD “The
Talmud is a record of rabbinic discussions pertaining to Jewish
law, ethics, customs and history. The Talmud has two components,
the Mishnah (c. 200 CE), the first written compendium of Judaism’s
Oral Law, and the Gemara (c. 500 CE), a discussion of the Mishnah
and related Tannaitic writings that often ventures onto other
subjects…” [(Talmud) Wikipedia, 2009]
“The
Talmud distinguishes between the lice of the head and those of the
body, i.e., of the garments: the former have red blood; the
latter, white… Both are produced not by copulation, but by
uncleanliness; and cleanliness is therefore the best means of
getting rid of them… It is sinful to kill a louse in the presence
of other people on account of the disgust thus caused.”
[Mumcuoglu, 2005]
“The
view of the spontaneous generation of lice and their lack of
sexual reproduction appears in several sources throughout the
Bavli (Talmud) One passage states: Gossip comes from peddlers,
and lice from rags. In other words, lice naturally reproduce
from rags.” [Safrai et al., 2006]
“ …the
Rabbinic writers of the Jewish Talmud identified… the kinnem
of the Egyptian plagues as lice.” [Anon, 2009a]
c. 850 AD Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn Sahl Rabban al-Tabari (c. 838 – c.
870 CE), a Persian physician of the 9th century, wrote
Firdaws al-Hikima (The Paradise of Wisdom) one of the
oldest Arabic compendiums of medicine. Chapter 190 discusses
various diseases of the skin, including lice (gaml).
Chapter 329 “On
the Genesis of Man and on the Generation (Procreation) of Animals.
Four kinds of generation: from the uterus (mankind and mammals),
from the egg (birds,fishes), from the earth (Spanish flies) [dhararih]
and worms) and from dirt (lice and nits).” [Meyerhof,
1931]
c. 1180 Moses Maimonides (1135-1204), a Spanish Jewish
rabbi and sage who served as a physician at the Egyptian court
wrote that: “It
is permissible to kill lice on Shabbat (Sabbath) because they are
(spontaneously generated)
from sweat.” [Maimonides, 1180]
c. 1240 Ibn Abi’l-Hadid (d. 1257), an Islamic scholar,
wrote in “Sharh Nahj al-balagha” that: “…maggots
come into being in fruit and meat, and lice in water-melons and
putrid places.” [Kruk, 1990]
~1260 Albertus Magnus (1193/1206? –1280) was a
Dominican Friar and alchemist.[(Albertus Magnus) Wikipedia,
2009] He noted that: “mercury is a kind of poison that “kills
lice and nits and other things that are produced from filth in the
pores.” [Cobb & Goldwhite, 2001]
c. 1300 Jehan Yperman (1260? – 1330?), a Flemish
military Surgeon, wrote:
“Lice
that grow on the body produce excrement that lodges between the
skin and the subcutaneous flesh, and when shed, it becomes nits or
lice.” [Yperman, 2003]
c.1330 Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyya (1292 – 1350), a famous
Sunni Islamic jurist and commentator on the Qur’an, wrote many
books. [(Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyya) Wikipedia, 2007] One of
these books was: “Healing with the Medicine of the Prophet.”
[Ibn Qayyim, 2006]
“The
Prophet’s guidance on treating and removing lice from the head.
… Lice appear on the head and body for two reasons, external and
internal. The external cause occurs due to uncleanness and impure
substances that the skin might carry. The internal reason is
caused by rotted substances that the body expels through the skin
and then rots due to the wetness in the skin’s pores. The lice
appear then (and feed on these rotted substances). Many times,
lice appear after one suffers from various illnesses and diseases,
because in this case cleanliness is ignored. Also, children are
the typical victims of lice because they play in and deal with wet
things and because of their careless nature. This is why the
Prophet ordered that the heads of the sons of Ja’far be shaved, as
shaving is one of the best cures for lice because it exposes the
skin to the sun and allows harmful moistures under the skin to
evaporate. The, the head should be anointed with the cures that
prevent lice from reproducing and kill them.” [Ibn
Qayyim, 2006]
1544 Thomas Phaer, in the first pediatric textbook
written in English, noted that: “Somtymes
not only chyldren but also other ages are annoyed with lyce. They
procede of a certain corrupte humour, and are engendred within the
skynne, crepyng out alyve through the poores, whiche , yf they
beginne to swarme in excedyng nombre, that dysease is called of
the Grekes Phthiryasys.” [Phaer, 1544]
1577 William Harrison, a chaplain to Lord Cobham
and later Canon of Windsor, wrote: “Yet
sure I am of this, that no one living creature corrupteth without
the production of another, as we may see by ourselves, whose flesh
doth alter into lice, and also in sheep for excessive numbers of
flesh flies, if they suffer to lie unburied or uneaten by the dogs
and swine, who often and happily present such needless generations.”
[Harrison, 1577]
1584 Giambattista della Porta [1535-1615] was a
Neapolitan scholar of the natural and physical sciences. In 1584
he completed his encyclopedic work titled: “Natural Magic”,
which included both ancient and contemporary knowledge. In the 2nd
Book (based on ancient writings), he asserts that animals and
insects can be produced spontaneously from
putridification. [della
Porta, 1584]
late 16th C.
“Ambroise
Pare (c.1510 - 1590) was a French surgeon. He was the great
official royal surgeon for the kings Henry II, Francis II, Charles
IX, and Henry III and is considered one of the fathers of
surgery.” [(Ambroise Pare)
Wikipedia, 2009]
He wrote of human lice: “These
three sorts of animals are engendered from a multitude of humors
and corrupt humidities, made by a viscid portion of the sweat,
that collects and stops the pores of the the true skin. Small
children are very subject to them, as they so often crapulate and
engender them in their excrements. Lice are engendered in all
portions of our bodies, even in the masses of our blood, as Pliny
bears witness in several places.”
[Minor, 1898]
c. 1595 One of the first compound microscopes was
developed in 1595 by Hans and Zacharias Janssen in Middelburg,
Holland. [(Microscope) Wikipedia, 2008]
17th Cent. 17th century physicians
still followed Aristotle’s dictum that lice were born from sweat
by a “spontaneous generation” phenomenon. [Aristotle,
350 BC] However, their patients continued to treat themselves
by delousing. This is often shown in 17th century
paintings, especially in Dutch “genre painting”. [Cabotin,
1994] [Mumcuoglu, 2002] (See nit picking portrayed in Gerard
ter Borch’s 1652 painting: “Woman Combing a Child’s Hair,”
which is printed on the cover page of “Emerging Infectious
Diseases,” 5(2) Mar-Apr 1999). In 1658-60, Pieter de Hooch
(1629-84) painted “Mother and Child with Its Head in Her Lap.”
This painting showed the mother picking through the girl’s hair
for lice. [Hughes, 2001] Sculptures representing trained
monkeys delousing humans can be found in Lisbon, Portugal. [Annon.,
2004]
1617 Cornelius Lapide (1567-1637), a
Professor of theology in the Academy of Louvain, and a Flemish
Jesuit priest, asserted that: “lice,
flies, maggots and the like were not created directly by God but
by spontaneous generation, as lice from sweat.”
[Lapides, 1617]
1648 Rene Descartes (1596 –1650), the French
philosopher, mathematician, and physicist, developed the
Cartesian Coordinate system and was a key figure in the
Scientific Revolution. [(Rene Descartes) Wikipedia, 2009]
He wrote: “…
so little is
required to make an animal, it is really not surprising that we
see so many animals, so many worms, so many insects spontaneously
forming in all putrefied matter,” [Broughton & Carriero,
2008]
1652 Alexander Ross wrote: “This
vermin breeds most in those given to sweat, to nastinesse, and
abound in putrified humours, between flesh and skin, whose
constitutions are hot and moist, as children; and according to
either of the four humours are predominant, so is the color of
lice, some being red, some white, some brown, some black;
sometimes they burst out of all parts of the body, as in Herod,
and in that Portugal, of whom Forestus speaks [1. 4.
de vitiis capitis] out of whose body they swarmed so fast,
that his two men did nothing else but sweep them of, so that they
carried whole baskets full. Sometimes they breed but in some parts
onely, as in the head or arm-pits. Zacuta mentioneth one
who was troubled nowhere but in his eie-lids, out of which they
swarmed in great numbers.” [Ross, 1652]
1653 Robert Pemell wrote in “De
Morbis Puerorum”: “If
persons of years live nastily and do not change (clothes) often,
they soon become lousey. But tis very familiar for Children to
breed Lice. They arise from a hot and moist matter which
putrifieth in the skin, or pores of the body. Sometimes they are
bred by eating of Figs, in grown persons because they ingender bad
juyce. The signs are apparent, for the lice are bred both on head
and body.…If lice be onely in the head, in many it preserves
their health, because they consume much excrementitious humors.”
[Pemell, 1653]
1664 Robert Hooke (1635-1703), "the father of
microscopy," noted that: “Lice
proceed from Parents of their own kind, and not (as formerly was
supposed) from certain juices or humours of human bodies; which
may serve indeed to nourish them, but can never breed them.”
[Hooke, 1664][(Robert Hooke) Wikipedia, 2009]
1668 Francisco Redi (1627-1697)
showed by experiment that maggots are not spontaneously generated
from rotten meat, but rather require the presence of flies to lay
eggs on the meat. He also showed that “Lice
are bred of Eggs or nits, laid by their female parent; he having
discerned by a Microscope some nits yet pregnant with young ones,
others, emptied of them.”
[Anon., 1670] [Redi, 1668] However, the belief in “spontaneous
generation” of life remained strong for the next 200 years
until the 1870’s, after the definitive experiments of Louis
Pasteur [Pasteur, 1864] and John Tyndall.
[Tyndall, 1881]
1669 In 1669 Jan Swammerdam (1637 – 1680) made
careful microscope observations of insects combined with
meticulous dissections, to show
the errors of spontaneous generation. This information formed the
basis of the modern understanding of development.
However, it was not until 1737 that this information was
published, first in Dutch and Latin, and then twenty-one years
later in English. [Swammerdam, 1737] [Swammerdam, 1758]
1676 Following the unexpected death of Nathaniel
Bacon, Jr., (the leader of Bacon’s rebellion), Sir William
Berkeley (the Governor of Virginia) wrote: “But
within three weekes after, the Justice and Judgemen of God
overtook him. His usual oath which he swore at least a Thousand
times a days ‘God damme my Blood’ and God infectd his blood that
it bred Lice in incredible number so that for twenty dayes he
never washt his shirts but burned them. To this God added the
‘Bloody flux’ and an honest Minister wrote this Epitaph on him:
Bacon is dead, I am sorry at my hart that Lice and flux should
take the hangman’s part.”
[Berkeley, 1676] This episode is yet another instance where
the ‘Lousy disease’ was invoked to explain the death of a hated
opponent.
1687 Francisco Redi wrote a small book announcing
the discovery of Sarcoptes scabiei by Gio. Cosimo Bonomo.
The book was based on a letter written by Bonomo to Redi in which
he described the microscopic observation of the deposit of an egg
by a ‘itch’ mite.
"With
great earnestness I examined whether or not these animalcules laid
eggs, and after many inquiries, at last by good fortune while I
was drawing the figure of one of them by a microscope, from the
hinder part I saw drop a very small and scarcely visible white
egg, almost transparent and oblong, like to the seed of a
pineapple.
"I oftentimes found these eggs afterwards, from which no doubt
these creatures are generated, as all others are, that is from a
male and female, though I have not yet been able by any difference
of figure to distinguish the sex of these animals."
[Ramos-e-Silva, 1998]
1702 Anton van Leeuwenhoek performed
a series of experiments, which once again disproved Aristotle’s
theory of “spontaneous generation.” [Aristotle, 350BC]
Leeuwenhoek “showed that
weevils of granaries (in his time commonly supposed to be bred
from wheat as well as in it) are really grubs hatched from eggs
deposited by winged insects. Some theorists asserted that the flea
was produced from sand and others from dust or the like, but
Leeuwenhoek proved that it was bred in the regular way of winged
insects.” [Anon., 2006] He
wrote: “Seeing the wondrous
dispensations of Nature whereby these “little animals” are created
so that they may live and continue their kind, our thoughts must
be abashed and we ask ourselves, can there even now be people who
still hang on to the ancient belief that living creatures are
generated out of corruption?”
[Leeuwenhoek, 1702]
1728 Ephraim Chambers noted in his
Cyclopedia that Spontaneous Generation (Also called
Equivocal Generation or an Egyptian Doctrine) was
passé. “This method of
generation, which we also call Spontaneous, was commonly
asserted and believed among the ancient Philosophers: But the
Moderns, from more and better Observations, unanimously reject it,
and hold that all Animals, nay and Vegetables too, are
Univocally produced, that is, by Parent Animals, and
Vegetables of the same Species and Denomination.”
[Chambers, 1728]
1730-1802 “From
1730 to1802, no new case of phthiriasis was published, and at the
end of the period, several men of observation questioned the
existence of the disease. The entomologists now knew a good deal
about the anatomy and physiology of lice, and they doubted the
capacity of these aerobic insects to live under the skin and lay
eggs there. Although some medical men still advocated the theory
of spontaneous generation, it had little support from the
entomologists and scientists of this time.” [Bondeson,
1998]
1745-1748 John Needham (1713-1781), a Scottish Catholic
priest and naturalist showed that microorganisms grew in soups
that had been exposed to air. He briefly boiled some of his soup
and poured it into ‘clean’ flasks with cork lids and
microorganisms still grew in the soup. He suggested that these
experiments showed that there was a ‘life force’ present in the
air that could cause ‘spontaneous generation’ of microorganisms in
his soups. [(John Needham) Wikipedia, 2009]
1746 Jean Astruc (1684-1766), chief
physician to the King of France, wrote a treatise on the diseases
of children. [Astruc, 1746] The 2nd Chapter of the book
is titled: “Of the Phthiriasis, or Morbus Pedicularis.”
Based on the experiments of Leewenhoek [Leewenhoek, 1702]
and Vallisneri (1661 – 1730), Astruc dismissed the theory of ‘spontaneous
generation’ and asserted that Pediculi are born from eggs
fixed to the roots of hairs. They pass by contact from one
infected person to another. Adults are less frequently infected
than children. However, he claims to have seen closed skin cysts
filled with lice. He drew an analogy with the deposit of fly
larvae into openings in the skin of cows, and the later emergence
of flies, and postulated that the pediculi have a “…sharp
rostrum and head, whence they enter by the smallest aperture or
excoriation, nay by the very pores of the skin, like mercury.”
[Astruc, 1746]
1768 Lazzaro Spallanzani
(1729-1799), a professor of Natural History at the university of
Pavia, proved that microbes can be transported by air and that
they can be killed by boiling the media. [(Spallanzani)
Wikipedia, 2009] His work paved the way for later research by
Louis Pasteur. [Pasteur, 1865]
1771 The first edition of the Encyclopaedia
Britannica dismissed abiogenesis (the generation of animals
from inorganic matter): “This kind of generation is now quite
exploded by the learned.” [Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1771]
1799 “
M. Marchilli, surgeon, member of
the Institute of Genoa, published the following case in the
memoirs of the Academy of that city: A woman, aged 49 or 50 years
… had parasites (pediculi) communicated to her head, in using a
comb which did not belong to her. She used means (veratrum
sabadilla) which had been successful in destroying these insets in
the past, but they continued to multiply so rapidly that, though
six or seven hundred of them were killed several times a day,
there was scarcely any relief. They presented, too, different
colors: some were white, grey, black, reddish or yellowish, and
mostly very small. Decoctions of tobacco, vinegar, etc., having
failed, and the use of a comb to remove or kill them, the hair was
cut and the head shaved. Some relief was thus obtained, by using
the razor every second day, but soon some appeared on the pubes. …
The surgeon-general of the French army, in Italy, recommended
mercury, which, instead of destroying them, made them discharge by
the thousands. … Musk, camphor, onions, strong aromatics were
tried in vain. … Submitted to the microscope, the author could
find no difference between them and the pediculi humani of
Linnaeus. He tried experiments with various substances to destroy
them, without arriving at anything definite.
(Eventually) …
our author lost sight of the case.”
[Eve, 1857]
1801
Erasmus Darwin (1731 – 1802) was an English physician, poet,
natural philosopher, and the grandfather of Charles Darwin.
[(Erasmus Darwin) Wikipedia, 2007] He wrote in “Zoonomia”that:
“There is said to be a disease in which these animals (lice) are
propagated in indestructible numbers, so as to destroy the
patient.” As a treatment he suggested: “Cleanliness, mercurial
ointment(*), stavisacria(*) in powder, or tincture of it in spirit
of wine. Spirt of wine alone? Bath of oil?” [Darwin, 1801]
1808 Robert Willan (1757-1812), an English
dermatologist observed that the marvelous histories of fatality
occasioned by lice are probably ascribable to confounding some
other insect for lice. [Willan, 1808]
1810 Nicholas Appert (1750-1841), a French chef,
applied Spallanzani’s results to commercial food, placing it in
clean bottles, sealing them tightly, and then boiling them. These
techniques founded the canning industry in 1810. Appert won a
20,000 franc prize from Napoleon Bonaparte for his results.
c. 1823 According to C. H. Fuchs, “…
mites
resembling lice are said to arise in the unbroken skin and to come
forth from peculiar opening tumors.” [Ziemssen, 1885]
1824 “In
1824 the German Dr. Henric Christian Alt proposed a new theory in
his doctoral dissertation on phthiriasis. He believed that a
previously unknown species of louse, Pediculus tabescentium,
or the phthiriasis louse, caused this disease, and that it did not
develop from nits like other lice but was spontaneously generated.
Alt’s theories were accepted throughout Europe, for they were
generally considered a better explanation of the many bizarre
features of the disease than those previously essayed.”
[Bondeson, 1998]
1832 John Stephenson, MD and Fellow of the Royal
Society, wrote: “The
generation of lice, in connection with Prurigo senilis,
though not fatal, is frequently a very troublesome and obstinate
malady …” [Stephenson, 1832]
1836 Hermann Burmeister (1807–1892), a German
zoologist and entomologist, noted that many credible authorities
confirm the equivocal generation of insects, and that “…
the best known
phenomenon of this description is the Phthiriasis, or lousy
disease, in which a particular species of louse (Pediculus
tabescentium, Alt.) originates upon the skin, and collects in
great numbers at particular spots, chiefly upon the breast, the
back, and the neck, between the folds of the skin, making the skin
uneven, so that scale shaped lappets of the epidermis peel off,
and beneath which the lice conceal themselves. We find in
Ancient, and here and there in modern authors, testimonies of
their spontaneous origin, the true cause whereof may consist of a
general corruption of the juices in old, weak, and enervated
subjects. Pheretima, according to Herodotus, and Antiochus
Epiphanes, both Herodians, Sylla, Alemanus, the Emperor Maximian,
the poet Ennius, the philosophers Pherecydes and Plato, Philip the
Second, and the poet and actor Iffland, are said to have died of
it; and very recently at Bonn. At the clinical school there, a
woman of seventy was found to be thus diseased, but was cured by
the rubbing in of the oil of turpentine.” Burmeister wrote
that human lice were generated from sweat. However, he noted that
the insects, described by Aristotle as the cause of deaths of
Alemanus and Pherecydes, were not lice, but rather Acari of
the itch, because they burrowed in swellings of the skin and came
out when the swellings were opened. [Burmeister, 1836]
c. 1855 Dr. Gaulke was a country practitioner from
Insterburg, Germany. He described “…
two cases
where he had met with whole colonies of lice under the skin in
boils, and explains that the louse enters the skin by penetrating
it with his proboscis.” [Neumann, 1872] He “…
reported a
series of cases of so called ‘genuine phthiriasis’ which
has been said to have been produced each time by pediculus
vestimenti. … Gaulke expressed the view that the pregnant
animals pierced the skin with their anal sting in order to lay
their eggs under the epidermis.” [Ziemssen, 1885] [Bondeson,
1997]
1857 Frederich
Kuchenmeister, was a German Physician who was an expert on human
and animal parasites. He was well known for developing scientific
meat inspections by veterinarians, and for his experiments which
proved the importance of cystic worms in the development of
Taenia Multiceps in sheep. [Anon, 2009b] He was a
member of The Natural History and Medical Society of Dresden.
He wrote: “For the present I join with those who suppose that a peculiar species,
Pediculus tabescentium, does not exist.”
[Kuchenmeister, 1857]
1861 Leonard
Landois (1837-1902), a German physiologist who was a member of the
German Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, wrote “Uber der
Haarbalgparasiten des Menchen (About the parasites of Men),”
in 1861. [(Leonard Landois) Wikipedia, 2009] He noted that
“…not all cases of
phthiriasis cited in the literature were really such, that the
disease consists in an increase of the pediculus vestimenti,
that therefore Alt’s separate species of pediculus tabescentium
does not exist, and that in the case of grave disease the animals
in question enter the human skin in large numbers and there cause
either open or covered pedicular ulcers.”
[Ziemssen, 1885]
1864 Experiments performed by Louis Pasteur
demonstrated conclusively that the theory of ‘spontaneous
generation’ was false. His paper won a contest sponsored by
The French Academy. [Pasteur, 1864]
1865 Ferdinand Ritter von Hebra
(1816-1880), an Austrian physician and dermatologist, was the
founder of the New Vienna School of Dermatology. [(Ferdinand
Ritter von Hebra) Wikipedia, 2009] He noted
“… that pediculi, owing to their
anatomical structure, cannot live in closed cavities nor in
fluids; that no observer, not even Landois, has ever really seen
such an occurrence; and that neither the sense attributed to it by
the older authors, nor in the sense suggested by Gaulke and
Landois (pediculi in and beneath the skin), is there, or has there
ever been, such a disease as phthiriasis.”
[Hebra, 1865][Hebra, 1866]
1872 Isidor
Neumann (1832 – 1906), wrote in his “Handbook
of Skin Diseases”: “It
was formerly believed that lice inhabit boils and abscesses of the
skin, and were developed from the bad humors of the body, and that
death was possible from this affection [Emperor Arnulf’s
(899 AD) death, and that of the Danish king, Snyo (~650
AD), from lice, see Husemann, deutsche Klinik, p.
33, 1867]. These views obtained during the last century,
Alibert (1768 – 1837) believing in the existence of the lousy
distemper; Devergie (1798 – 1879) also affirmed that poor
nourishment of the body might lead to the development of lice.
Even Fuchs assumed a spontaneous lousiness, and asserted
that cachectic (failing to thrive) persons had boils formed on
them, within which, besides pus and ichor (bile), there were lice.”
[Neumann, 1872]
1876 John Tyndall (1820-1893), an Irish optical
Physicist, answered the objection raised by supporters of ‘spontaneous
generation’, who had observed that microbes occasionally began
growing in boiled infusions of hay. Tyndall showed that sometimes
the hay was contaminated with spores, which can survive lengthy
boiling. [Tyndall, 1876] He developed the technique of fractional
sterilization which killed the otherwise heat resistant bacterial
spores. [(John Tyndall) Wikipedia, 2009]
“In
no instance is the least countenance lent to the notion that an
infusion deprived by heat of its inherent life, and placed in
contact with air cleansed of its visibly suspended matter, has any
power whatever to generate life anew.”
[Tyndall, 1881]
20th Cent. “During
the early years of the twentieth century, the lousy disease was
gradually forgotten. No new cases were reported, and in books on
classical and biblical medicine, it was mentioned only as an
example of the confused medical thinking of those times.”
[Bondeson, 1998]